Lawsuit Abuse News
More lawsuit abuse news on www.SickOfLawsuits.org
Puzzling Prescription
"Merck asked yesterday for the dismissal of the first Vioxx personal injury lawsuit scheduled to come to trial, contending that a man who died of a heart attack after being prescribed Vioxx never took the drug. The pharmaceutical company says that the man's widow has repeatedly lied and produced false evidence &. Ms. Rogers initially said that her husband 'took Vioxx for a long time on a very regular basis.' When Merck's lawyers pressed her for details, she said that he had visited a doctor on Aug. 10, 2001, 25 days before he died, and received a prescription for Vioxx. But the prescription was never filled, according to Merck &. Ms. Rogers then changed her story &. [claiming] that her husband had been given three sample packs, totaling 96 pills &. Suspicious of Ms. Rogers's story, Merck checked the samples, which federal rules require be closely tracked. The company said its records showed that the samples did not arrive at its distribution warehouse until March 2002, six months after Mr. Rogers died." The New York Times, April 13, 2005
Million Dollar Cure
"Medical malpractice lawsuits have been driving up the costs of health care for decades. In recent years, they have actually started to limit patient access to quality care &. [In] 2002, the malpractice cost to Americans was $25 billion - or $250 per American household &. Lottery-size awards drive the problem. The average award increased from $700,000 in 1999 to more than $1 million in 2001. Seven of the top 20 lawsuit awards in 2001 and 2002 were for malpractice resulting in a combined cost of $3 billion. Up to 40% of the awards wind up in the pockets of lawyers &.
|
|
A 2002 study by the Department of Health and Human Services found that [a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages], if taken national, would reduce health care costs by up to 9%, or $108 billion a year &. With more than $100 billion at stake, malpractice legislation is one prescription that needs to be filled." Commentary by Sally C. Pipes, Pacific Research Institute, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, April 3, 2005
Questionable Diagnosis
"[In] Federal District Court in Corpus Christi, Tex. last month several doctors testified that they diagnosed silicosis in patients they had never met or interviewed &. Evidence was entered in the Texas court that some doctors had little training in how to interpret X-rays to find signs of the illness and they reached their conclusions after spending just minutes looking at an X-ray. Some doctors backed away from their conclusions. One of them, Ray A. Harron, interrupted his own testimony to ask for a lawyer. Questions about Dr. Harron's diagnoses may undermine his prior diagnoses that more than 50,000 Manville trust claimants suffered from asbestosis &. Dr. Harron, who identified silicosis in a patient previously evaluated as suffering from asbestosis, was asked where the first illness went. He responded, 'I don't know.'" The New York Times, April 6, 2005
|